Add to Technorati Favorites

Search

Married But Playing

Sexy Cheaters

Married Personals-Sexy Chat

Video Chat

Americans Canadians May Share Views on Cheating

June 16th, 2010 by The Babe

Sun Media and Leger Marketing conducted a confidential survey of more than 1,500 Canadians coast to coast to learn their thoughts on who cheats and why.  The results are somewhat surprising in some areas and I’m thinking that same survey carried out across the border the results would be similar.  Americans and Canadians have many views in common…….

  • One in three Canadians say they’ve had an affair, with Ontarians and Quebecers the most likely to have stepped out on a partner (36% and 34% respectively).

  • Married men are much more likely to have cheated than married women (13% vs. 8%) although when it comes to having a physical relationship with someone else who is married, the genders are nearly neck and neck.

  • More than half of Canadians believe everyone thinks about cheating at some point.

  • Over a third of Canadians figure cheating doesn’t mean a lack of love for one’s partner, while 18% of Canadians think cheating once can actually be positive for a relationship.

  • Quebeckers are especially forgiving, or at least understanding, of infidelity – 53% of respondents in La Belle Province said cheating on someone doesn’t mean you don’t love them, and 28% said a one-off affair can actually be beneficial to the relationship.

  • A startling 40% of Canadians say they know they were cheated on at some point

  • Only 13% of Canadians think being unhappily married but staying together for the kids’ sake is
    justification for cheating.

  • Apparently getting back at a cheating spouse is only a reasonable excuse for 18% of those surveyed.

  • Four in five of Canadians would confront their significant others if they suspected them of cheating.

  • 60% of Canadians would check their credit card statements or phone bills for evidence, and nearly half of Canadians would go so far as to follow their partners to see where they were wandering to.

  • If amateur private eye activities unearthed evidence of an affair, 50% would confront their partners with the proof and talk about it (with women being more likely to take this approach than men).

  • Two out of five Canadians would ask if their partner was cheating and give him or her a chance to come clean before they waved the evidence in their face..

  • And if their partners did “fess up”, what then?

  • 29% would end the relationship then and there

  • 43% of Canadians would keep our options open and try to work it out.

  • Only 10% of Canadians would automatically forgive our partner’s transgressions.

    Ultimately forgiving the spouse or partner could depend on the nature of the affair.

  • Nearly two thirds of Canadians would find our significant other having an affair with our best friend the hardest to forgive

  • 28% said it would be most difficult if it was someone at work

  • One in four thought an ex would be the biggest blow.

When we seek out that old boyfriend or girlfriend on Facebook, are we innocently checking in to see how that person’s life is going? Or are we secretly hoping for a confidential hookup?

  • 77% of Canadians admit that we’ve been in contact with someone we used to be in a relationship with, though it’s nearly split down the middle when it comes to the number of Canadians who initiated the contact and those of Canadians who found ourselves on the receiving end of an ex reaching out.

  • Just over half of Canadians figure Facebook and other social networking sites are the best way to
    re-establish contact with a previous partner,

  • only 10% of Canadians think looking up an former flame is a big no-no.

  • two out of five of Canadians would be willing to chat with an ex-lover because we might be able
    to become friends again.

  • Another two out of five would exchange cursory updates but not try to carry on communication.

  • Folks in British Columbia. were much more open to the idea of being friends with an ex (53%) than those in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (35%), while Quebecers were the most likely to say a firm “non!” – what’s in the past is in the past.

  • In general, they found women are more likely to think that reconnecting with a past lover is a bad idea.

  • A full third of those surveyed believe that all this talk of being friends with exes is baloney, and the only reason former flames try to open lines of communication is to re-establish a romantic relationship.

  • Nearly two-thirds of Canadians would never get back together with an ex,

  • one in five Canadians pine for the one that got away, and would do anything to re-ignite a specific previous relationship.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Keep It In Your Pants In Kandahar

June 8th, 2010 by The Babe

Recently the commander of Canada’s battle group in Kandahar, Brigadier General Daniel Ménard, was suddenly kicked to the curb and ordered to return to Canada. The unexpected firing, almost certain to end the career of a soldier considered to be on his way to the top of the army, came after his commanding officer received reports that the General was having a sexual relationship with a female member of his staff.

His firing as head of the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan because of his alleged affair — is the first Canadian general officer to be dismissed on the battlefield since the Second World War.

An extramarital affair might not seem a serious issue to those outside of the military. The public is more than willing to forgive transgressions by movie stars, politicians (including presidents) and pro golfers. But it isn’t the extramarital sex (Ménard is married with two children) that poses the problem. It’s that it happened between soldiers, in a war zone.

It turns out that Canadian soldiers in battle are not allowed to have intimate relations of any kind.

That includes kissing, hand-holding and passing naughty notes in the mess tent. Amazingly, the rule applies even if they are married, which Gen. Menard is, although, unfortunately, not to the subordinate he allegedly was having sex with.

The hypothetical scenario behind the military’s banning of  relationships amongst soldiers in war zones is simple. One is unlikely to order someone they’re in love with to risk death. Even if the two participants in a relationship are able to set aside their feelings and perform as professionals, others in the unit who know of their relationship might come to doubt that they would be treated fairly

Imagine having to fight a battle with someone who recently dumped you. If ordered by someone who’d just rejected your affections to stay behind and die, might you not be the least bit suspicious as to their motive?

Had Ménard been a low-ranked officer or an enlisted man, caught having an affair with a fellow soldier, it’s possible they would have gotten off with a thorough dressing down from an officer, off the record, and an order to be more discrete about it. But since Ménard was the top man, even though he’d never have faced the  decision, from the safety of his headquarters, to send another member of the HQ staff into a minefield, he still had to go. A general cannot be judged by a different standard than the troops he commands.

Would you rather have active-duty soldiers who are actually getting laid or just desperately wishing they were? Someone needs to do a study on proving that celibacy and sexual frustration – actually improves performance in battle or any other aspect of life.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Another Look At Presidential Candidates Views On Infidelity

May 17th, 2010 by The Babe

In December 2007, CBS News anchor Katie Couric For the series “Primary Questions: Character, Leadership & The Candidates,” asked the leading presidential candidates questions designed to go beyond politics and show what really makes them tick.

Based on what we know now – John Edwards / Rielle Hunter  Bill Clinton / Monica Lewinsky scandals and the purported affair between Barack Obama / Vera Baker, I thought you might find interesting to take Another Look At Presidential Candidates Views On Infidelity.

Couric asks

Whether They Can Understand Voters Who Don’t Feel Comfortable Supporting A Candidate Who Cheated

Here are some of their responses:

The Question by Katie Couric:

Harry Truman said, quote, “A man not honorable in his marital relations is not usually honorable in any other.” Many people say they don’t feel comfortable supporting someone who’s not remained faithful to their spouse. Why should they?

————————-

Barack Obama

Obama: Why should they not –

Couric: Support someone who isn’t faithful. In other words, people feel uncomfortable. Is that appropriate? Or, you know, how do you feel about that?

Obama: Well, I … you know, I do think that public morality … and private morality are not sum — you know, or not equivalent. You know, we — some of our greatest presidents haven’t always been terrific husbands. And some who have been wonderful husbands have been rotten presidents.

So, you know, I think that other countries have typically taken a little more casual on approach when it comes to the personal lives … of elected officials. And I think that there has to be some space for privacy. I will say this.

I do think that I’m very proud of the relationship I’ve got with Michelle, and the work and the value that I’ve put into it. And I hope it does say something about my character, the strength of my marriage. But, you know … if I was — had a wonderful marriage but didn’t have good ideas in terms of providing health care for every American or repairing the damage that’s been done to our foreign policy by George Bush, then my marriage alone shouldn’t qualify me … for being president.

Couric: Should infidelity qualify someone, or should infidel …

Obama: Disqualify.

Couric: … infidelity disqualify someone?

Obama: You know … I’m very cautious about applying strict moral rules to … or a blanket universal rule to … people. Because, you know, I mean, there are some people who might say that the fact that, you know, I indulged in drugs when I was young, disqualifies me. I mean, there are a lot of ways that you can apply that kind of morality. What I’m always hopeful of is that people are judge our public servants based on their passion, their commitment, their public integrity, how they operate with that public trust. And, you know, if we start getting too sanctimonious about some of these issues then there aren’t going to be that many people who are able or willing to serve.

————————-

Hilary Clinton

Clinton: Well, I can certainly understand why some people would feel that way, and … that is their perfect right to do so. But I think … would be a tough standard for most of American history to be able to meet, when we look at people who have made a big difference in our country.

I think there’s more to someone’s honor and integrity, and to their public service. I think sometimes we confuse the private and the public in ways that are not necessarily useful. So, of course, it’s a deeply personal matter that I take personally. But I think on the public stage, there are a number of people who have represented our country, led our country, accomplished great achievements on behalf of our country who might have some challenges in their personal life, but have made a great contribution.

————————-

John Edwards

Couric: So how important do you think it is in the grand scheme of things?

Edwards: I think the most important qualities in a president in today’s world are trustworthiness, sincerity, honesty, strength of leadership. And certainly that goes to a part of that. It’s not the whole thing. But it goes to a part of it.

Couric: So you think it’s an appropriate way to judge a candidate?

Edwards: Yeah. But I don’t think it’s controlling. I mean, I think that, as you point out, there have been American presidents that at least according to the … stories we’ve all heard, that were not faithful, that were in fact good presidents. So I don’t think it controls the issue. But I think it’s certain … something reasonable for people to consider.

————————-

John McCain

McCain: You know … that’s an area that I never get into. Because I think that people make judgments, and you can judge other people. I’m not very good at that. And so, I think it’s up to each person’s personal view of the individual, and … everybody has a different view.

I say that because you and I know that there have been some leaders in American history — latest information about Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I happen to still think that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an important president at a time in our history when we needed some courage. And so … that’s just frankly, a judgment that I leave to others.

————————-

Bill Richardson

Richardson: Well, I think this is … if you’re — if you’re not faithful to your wife, you’re not faithful to the country, to your ideals. You’re not faithful to the spirit in which Americans trust their political leaders. And they expect them to … have a sense of honor.

Nobody’s perfect. I’ve been married to Barbara for 35 years. We’ve had our differences, our difficulties, but we’ve stayed together. But I think being faithful is … an essential component of any relationship. It’s whether a voter can trust you to … be thinking about the common good as opposed to personal ambition or anything else.

Couric: Do you think infidelity is reason enough not to vote for someone?

Richardson: I don’t think so. I think that, you know, infidelity is … a serious problem in any marriage. But, you know, everybody sins. And it’s whether you’re forgiven, whether you forgive yourself, whether you have faith in God. You know, perfection … is something that politicians, they should not stand themselves for perfection. Nobody’s perfect.

————————-

Mitt Romney

Couric: Well, what do you think of people who base their judgment at least partially on a candidate’s ability to remain faithful to his or her spouse?

Romney: You know, I let people look at me any way they want to. I’m not gonna give advice to the American people in which aspects of a person’s life they look at. After all, the president of the United States is gonna be under a microscope. He will be. The first lady will be. The whole family will be. Every mistake will be open to the world. In some respects, you respect the nation.

In some respects you represent an example to the children of America. So we’re gonna get looked at in all sorts of ways. And I’m not gonna try and counsel the American people as to what to look at. I know they look at my faith, for instance. And I’m happy to have them do so. Some are critical. Some are positive. It’s just part of the package. And take me as … the whole character that I am.

Couric: Do you think that people shouldn’t vote for candidates if they are — commit adultery, for example?

Romney: I think people should be able to do what they want to do. And express their own views when they get into the … voting booth. I’m not gonna tell them how to … do that. And I know that people will, again, take their own counsel.

————————-

Fred Thompson

Couric: Do you think it’s an appropriate way to evaluate a candidate?

Thompson: Everybody’s gotta make up their own mind about that. I think that you can evaluate a candidate any way you want to. It’s a free country. There are a lot of things that go into it. When we elect a president, we’re electing the leader of the free world. We’re facing tremendous challenges ahead. I don’t think we’ve come to terms with the nature of the threats against us, really in terms … of radical Islam and the things we’ve got to do and the threats to the economy with the growing retirement population, things that, of that nature.

So, nobody’s perfect. Everybody has weaknesses and has made mistakes one time or another in life. But everybody’s gotta decide for themselves what they want to consider that go into making up. The leader is going to have to deal with these problems of the country.

————————-

Mike Huckabee

Huckabee: I can. If you violate the promise that you made to the one person on earth to whom you’re supposed to be closest to, and this vow was made in front of your families, your closest friends, and God, and you don’t keep that, then can we trust you to keep a promise that you made to people you don’t even know?

Huckabee: I don’t think it means that a person can’t be a good president. Obviously, there have been some great presidents who had personal issues. I think that’s going to be true of all leaders. Nobody’s perfect. Nobody. Me, anybody else. We all have flaws.

One of the things that I think I’ve learned most about life, particularly from my experience of having been a pastor, is that the people that you think are the best people on earth? Well, they’ve got some secrets sitting in there, about some pretty dark spots.

And the people you think are the dregs of the earth, there’s some qualities there. May not be on the surface, but they’re there. The capacity to make great decisions is not always the same as the capacity to make really good personal decisions.

But it does come to the matter of, I think, whether the general population will trust you, and that if what you’re saying is really true. They may believe that what you do is a good thing. It’s just they don’t, they may not believe that what you say is necessarily the truth.

————————-

Rudy Giuliani

Giuliani: Sure, I can. Absolutely. You know, they look the every single part of us. And the … only thing I can say to people is I’m not perfect, you know? And I’ve made mistakes in my life. And that … not just in that area. In other areas and I try to learn from it. I try to — I feel sorry about them. I try to learn from them so I don’t repeat them.

Sometimes I even repeat them and … you try again. I mean, you … so — I have a, maybe a more generous view of human beings and a more generous view of life. I mean, it comes from growing up as a Catholic. I mean, we’re all sinners. We’re all struggling. We’re all trying hard. We ask for forgiveness, and then we try to improve ourselves again. And I’ve — relate to other people that way. Relate to the world that way.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Was Peace Prize Winner Getting A Piece On The Side

May 7th, 2010 by The Babe

Vera Baker

Is it possible our 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner was getting a piece on the side? President Barack Obama has been accused of cheating on his wife Michelle with a campaign worker. The American supermarket tabloid, the National Enquirer, claims that Barack Obama and Vera Baker had a fling at Washington, D.C. hotel and a security video had all the records!

While running for US Senate, rumor has it that Obama secretly met Vera Baker at a hotel in Washington D.C.

One of the Enquirer’s “confidential investigations” apparently has learned that Obama first became close to 35 year-old Vera Baker in 2004 when she worked tirelessly to get him elected to the US Senate, raising millions in campaign contributions.

It appears that a hired limo driver confirmed the story to be true. He claims he picked Vera Baker up from a friend’s house and then carried her to The Hotel George. The driver then apparently waited in the lobby while Vera went to a room, which he says was Obama’s room. To the best of limo driver’s knowledge, Vera did not have her own room at the hotel.

It’s also being rumored that Baker was suddenly taken off the campaign midway through. Speculation is that Michelle Obama didn’t approve of Vera and was uncomfortable with her and Barack working so close together. Is this another Monica Lewinsky/Bill Clinton scandal? Or is the media desperate to start trouble wherever they can???

Is there anything beyond them staying in the same building? I admit, I thought the same of reports that John Edwards cheated on his wife with, knocked up and tried to pay off Rielle Hunter were entirely fictional. How wrong I was.

Initially, the scandal first broke in October, 2008.  Ms Baker then proceeded to leave the political scene and move to Martinique, where she married.  She returned to Washington after Obama’s election and began working for Illinois Senator Roland Burris.  But once the scandal broke again, she left the senators office.

Although Vera Baker has denied the allegations, the Enquirer has offered a whopping sum of $1 million for confirmation.

The cyberspace storm of innuendo and unfounded rumors isn’t likely to die down anytime soon and it appears that many don’t believe the Enquirer story. Is that because it’s probably not true or simply because they choose to believe that one of their idols is not capable of blighting his marriage and career with infidelities?

It’s sadly true that though the National Enquirer is very often wrong in their attention grabbing headlines, very often there’s some foundation to their stories.

Michelle Obama isn’t a wife I’d like to cross pass with over an extramarital affair. I’d say she’s very likely to “whip his black ass”. For your sake, Mr. President, I’m hoping the gossip is untrue!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Larry Kings Affair Deserving Of The Jerry Springer Show

April 20th, 2010 by The Babe

Larry & 8th Wife Shawn

RumorsCelebrity ScandalsFamous Cheaters

Larry King is recognized as one of the premier broadcast interviewers. King has conducted some 40,000 interviews with politicians, athletes, entertainers, and other newsmakers. He has won an Emmy Award, two Peabody Awards, and ten Cable ACE Awards.

In a story fit for the Jerry Springer show, King is being accused by 8th wife Shawn Southwick of having an extramarital affair with her sister, Shannon Engemann, Engemann is denying that she did anything wrong.

The tabloid claims Larry spent over a million dollars to put up Shannon at the swank Beverly Hills Hotel and bought her expensive gifts including a car.

Shawn’s 45 year-old sister Shannon reportedly told a friend “I had sex with Larry and he bought me an expensive car.”

Shawn said that she wouldn’t have felt so crazy if she’d caught Larry fooling around with a stranger. The fact that he’s cheated with her sister has made it so much worse.

When Shawn learned about her husband’s illicit affair, she took a little revenge – by having an affair herself.

Back in November 2008, the National Enquirer claimed Shawn cheated on Larry with their son’s baseball coach and 29 year-old aspiring actor, Hector Penate,

This little tryst (if true) sets her into the Cougar category as there appears to be a 20 years age difference between Shawn and Hector.

Whether or not the allegations are true, take a look back at the legendary late night host, who’s been married eight times to seven women, and his lengthy list of ex-wives …

  • Freda Miller married King in 1952 when he was 19. Their marriage
    ended in 53 when the marriage was annulled by their parents.
  • Annette Kaye Married to King briefly and gave birth to their son Larry Jr. in 1961. It’s said the King did not meet Larry Jr. until the son was in his thirties A little insight into King’s character? He divorced Kaye while she was pregnant
  • Alene Akins A former Playboy bunny. Like [tag]Liz
    Taylor[/tag], he married and divorced the same woman – twice. They
    had a son in 1962 But King and Akins obviously were still hot for one
    another. Five years and one wife later, (King married Mary Francis ‘Mickey’
    Stuphin in 1963, only to divorce her in 1966), the pair remarried. While
    their second go-around was also short-lived, as the couple divorced in 1972,
    Alene gave birth to daughter Chaia King in 1969.
  • Mary Francis “Mickey” Sutphin
  • Sharon Lepore 1976 – 1983 Math teacher and production
    assistant
  • Julie Alexander 1989 -1992 He met business woman Julie Alexander
    in 89 and proposed on their first date.
  • Shawn Southwick 1997 …. He married Shawn three days before he
    underwent heart surgery to clear a clogged blood vessel. They have 2 sons On
    King and Southwick’s 10th anniversary in September 2007, Southwick boasted
    she was “the only [wife] to have lasted into the two digits”.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Adultery Leaves A Trail Of Broken Hearts And Marriages

December 29th, 2009 by The Babe

Adultery was once considered a sin – or at least a secret. Not online. The Internet dating craze is blazing a trail of broken marriages thanks to dozens of sites inviting participants to identify themselves as “not so happily married,” “married but that shouldn’t matter” or even, “married but we swing.”

Studies show some 30 percent of online dating visitors are married – and recent research by the University of Florida reports that what starts out as flirting and cybersex quickly escalates into the real thing.

The Internet became an easy escape for “Barbara,” a 43-year-old married New Yorker who dated about 60 men in three years until she met Steve, who’s also married – but now sneaking around with Barbara. “We see each other once or twice a week,” she says. “We have a lot in common, have a great time together and the sex is phenomenal.”

She says a cold husband sent her surfing for more. “There was no warmth or any physical affection,” she says glumly. She tried cajoling her husband into seeing a marriage counselor, but after only one visit, he refused to return. She didn’t want a divorce because of their 7-year-old daughter, so she posted an ad in one of the adult dating sites online.

“I’m not interested in jeopardizing my marriage or anyone else’s,” she told The Post. “I just wanted to find someone special I could click with.”

Other women interviewed by The Post say they’ve been searching for deeper emotional relationships than their husbands are able to give – but aren’t ready to leave.

“I guess the sex just isn’t what it used to be when we first met,” says Nicole, 28, a married New Yorker.

“I miss the feeling of sex being new and exciting. It’s addicting.”

Addiction is something Chris Samuels, the co-director of a sexual addiction treatment center in Greenwich Village, understands all too well.

She’s treated many married and unmarried patients who’ve gotten caught up in Internet lust.

“Its power is almost trance-inducing,” she says. “You can troll these sites and have a fantasy ready and waiting. Cybersex can provide a quick and powerful high. It’s like crack cocaine to sex addicts.”

Alfred, 49, is a self-described Internet Lothario who says he’s been “swinging” for 23 years.

Before going online, he would post ads in “swinger magazines,” sometimes waiting two to four months to set up a first meeting. Now his desires can be gratified almost instantly by posting ads online.

“While I’m open to a relationship, I’d prefer someone I can meet for no-strings mutual sexual pleasure on a continuing basis,” he says.

Alfred’s new online ads generally attract several interested women (“I’m a seller in a buyer’s market,” he says proudly).

He usually hooks up with married women, but says there are plenty of singles who don’t mind that he’s already spoken for.

Unfortunately, while these spouses are sowing their wild oats, there’s likely to be someone at home who’s getting hurt.

John LaSage, 43, from California, could attest to that – his wife left him and his two teenage daughters to take off with an Internet boyfriend.

The experience led him to create chatcheaters.com – a Web site designed to help dissuade potential cheaters and to comfort those who’ve been hurt by them.

“Chatting is OK, cheating is not,” says LaSage.

“People should realize how quickly relationships can form online. Flirting can lead to real-world affairs.”

If you suspect your spouse of having an online affair, “Bring the issue out into the open,” he says.

“Look out for the warning signs” – like excessive Internet use, new email accounts, turning off the computer when you walk in the room.

“If you just want a sexual hit, you can masturbate a lot quicker than having an affair,” she says.

“But it’s about gratification. They want someone to find them attractive, someone to want them passionately.”

But not every married person who’s gone the online route has found the affair of their dreams.

Wayne, a 49-year-old man from New Jersey, complains that his inbox is usually cluttered with undesirable partners and a fair share of transsexuals and cross-dressers.

But that may be just the ticket for a 34-year-old Lower East Side “Rockerdude” who advertises online that he’s hoping to make sweet music with men, women – and anything in between.

“Yes, I am married, but we have a very liberal, open-minded relationship – so be brave,” he writes.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Infidelity Reaps Rewards For Family Of Cheating Husband

July 15th, 2009 by The Babe

Cheating husband pays for his infidelityIf you’re considering cheating on your wife, you may pay in more ways than one. It appears that cheating husband,Robert Charlton, had a roving eye for the ladies but was consumed with guilt and each time he strayed he’d buy his wife, Elizabeth, a bigger and more expensive piece of jewelry.

These little sex on the side love affairs were worth nearly $500,000 to his heirs, who sold their mother’s jewelry at auction in London.

The most expensive item in the auction was a Rivière necklace made up of 54 diamonds, which sold for £50,000. The auctioneers believe Mr Charlton would have paid at least £5,500 for it in the 1960s.

Other highlights included a large pendant which went for £44,000 and a chunky diamond solitaire ring that sold for £19,000. A pair of drop earrings went for £18,000 and a gold bangle decorated with nine diamonds fetched £20,000.

The Charlton’s were married 25 years and Robert’s sex affairs were an open secret in the family. Considering that 43 pieces of the love booty were sold, and the family kept some pieces, it’s now wonder poor Robert died at 63 and Elizabeth survived him until 2006 when she passed away at the age of 90.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

The Grief Of An Illicit Love’s Death

January 11th, 2009 by The Babe

Family secrets: the grief for my illicit love
A 35-year-old married mother of one tells of the guilt and despair that she feels after the death of her married lover

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags:

Is Lust The Reason We Have Extramarital Affairs

March 16th, 2008 by The Babe

cheatingtvshow2.jpgThere must be a million reasons why partners cheat on one another. Probably the one that stand’s out above all others is Lust! Unfortunately many of us let this primal urge dictate how we conduct outselves towards the people we supposedly love. Extramarital affairs have been around forever.

A recent survey of 10,000 people by the University of Chicago showed that 22% of men and 15% of women admitted cheating at least once during their relationship. So why do they stray?

There usually isn’t one reason why a partner strays from a relationship and there is no blanket profile of the typical cheater.

  • The grass is always greener on the other side – sad but true. What we don’t have looks a lot better than what we have already

  • Men are after the “spice of life” – variety. Men simply appear to want more sex and more satisfying sex

  • Women cheat for emotional reasons, for attention, to be reassured of their desirability or because they fell in love with someone else.

  • Most studies indicate the affair can happen early or late in a relationship, married or unmarried, kids or childless, man or woman, young or old and rich or poor – there are really no factors to dictate if a person is likely to cheat or not.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Cheating Spouses Do It On The Road

May 11th, 2007 by The Babe

By Gary Stoller, USA TODAY

Melissa cheats on her husband on business trips but not in her hometown. “That would be lethal,” she says.

Like many frequent business travelers, she uses the protection of the road to live a secret life of romance far from spouses or partners. Their affairs range from one-night stands to relationships that last for years. They’re usually with a co-worker, a business associate or someone they encounter often during repeat visits to a city.

“Business travel creates an opportunity to cheat away from prying eyes,” says infidelity expert Ruth Houston author of Is he Cheating on You? 829 Telltale Signs.

While no one has specifically studied business travel and infidelity, academics and therapists say cheating is probably more prevalent on the road than close to home. And the heightened exposure of business travelers to the possibility of infidelity increases the prospects that they and their employers could be left to air the details of their affairs in the courts or in the press.

The infidelities of traveling athletes, movie stars, musicians and other celebrities are standard tabloid fare. Joumana Kidd, the wife of NBA star Jason Kidd of the New Jersey Nets, for example, accused him in February in a divorce-court filing of affairs with various women in different cities.

An affair led to the downfall of former Boeing CEO Harry Stonecipher, who worked in Chicago and was asked to resign in 2005 after he had an extramarital affair with Debra Peabody, a Washington, D.C.-based vice president at the company. Both subsequently resigned.

In December, Julie Roehm, a former senior vice president at Wal-Mart, sued the company, claiming that it had violated her contract when she was fired that month. Wal-Mart countersued, alleging that she went on business trips and violated company policy by having an affair with a married man who worked for her. Wal-Mart said it is against company policy for an employee to become romantically involved with someone he or she supervises. “Associates who violate this policy will be subject to immediate termination,” it said.

Roehm, who also is married, said she is the victim of a “smear campaign.”

Only a minority of companies have specific policies regulating workplace romance, says Mark Oldman, co-founder of Vault, a company specializing in career information. “Most employers don’t want to reach into the personal life of employees or give the perception of trying to do so.”

But some companies expressly prohibit romantic relationships between employees, says Peter Petesch, a lawyer at Ford & Harrison, a national firm specializing in labor and employment law. “In the middle of these extremes are policies that require disclosure of relationships or bar relationships between persons in a supervisor-subordinate status,” he says.

Michael Lotito, an employment lawyer at law firm Jackson Lewis, says companies could face sexual-harassment claims when workers hook up on the road. “A relationship may begin in a welcome way, but sometime in the future, one person may want it to stop,” he says. “Suddenly, the events take on a different tone.”

Workplace romance could also influence awarding of contracts and cause “economic harm” to a company, Lotito says.

Hurt vs. Liability

But not all the affairs occurring during business travel involve co-workers, and most never make headlines. For many business travelers, the hurt they inflict on spouses and family usually outweighs the liability they create for employers.

Infidelity studies show that extramarital sex occurs in up to 25% of heterosexual marriages in the USA, according to Adrian Blow, a Michigan State University professor who is a marriage and family therapist. The studies show that more men than women are cheating, but none have specifically looked at business travelers.

That group is likely to have a higher infidelity rate, Blow and other experts say, because many factors make cheating easier. Among them: freedom from a spouse’s scrutiny and home responsibilities, more opportunities to meet new people, and the near-constant availability of alcohol at after-hour meals and social events.

Chris Arnzen of the National Institute of Marriage, a non-profit Christian counseling service, says business travel often involves competition for a sale or contract, and some people view sex as “a way to celebrate a success or soothe a defeat.” If that’s their outlook, “It sets them up for infidelity,” she says.

University of Washington sociology professor Pepper Schwartz says, for some, cheating while on the road involves less guilt.
“There seems to be a feeling,” says Schwartz, “that a fling at a convention, an interesting person met on a plane or a chance encounter is somehow more blameless than something done in one’s hometown or with a friend in one’s social circle.”

For Melissa, an affair added spice to her life and eased the loneliness of the road.

“You’re in your room alone at the end of the night and have to sleep with the remote,” she says. She and four other frequent business travelers who have been involved in affairs on the road talked to USA TODAY about their experiences, as did the wife of one of the business travelers. Each asked to remain anonymous because of unsuspecting family members, friends and co-workers.

Melissa, who is in her 40s and has been married for more than 20 years, says every few months on business trips she sleeps in a hotel with a married man in her company who lives in another state. “It’s not necessarily healthy,” she says, “but it gives me a reason to keep going.”

Melissa says she’s in love with her co-worker and doesn’t have any guilt. She says she has a “stagnant, brother-and-sister relationship” with her husband and loves him “as the father of my children.” She and her lover were drinking at a bar when they first were attracted to one another and realized they were more than friends.

Psychologist Dave Carder, a family therapist in Fullerton, Calif., says business travelers “are on a slippery slope headed for trouble” any time they go out to an entertainment venue, drink alcohol, eat expensive meals together, have time “to build a social, platonic friendship” and return to the same hotel. “Secrecy is the protection; alcohol is the barrier buster; and availability lights the fire.”

Robert, a married business traveler in the Midwest, says he has three steady lovers in three cities. He says his relationship with his wife is unfulfilling. “What makes her happy doesn’t make me happy,” he says. “At home, we have one giver, me, and one taker, her. I want a synergism where you love someone, and they love you.”

Robert, in his 60s, says he hasn’t told his wife about his three lovers. He met them on the Internet, and each one is married. Two of their husbands are unaware of him, but one has an “open marriage,” he says.

When traveling, “You don’t feel so attached to family and community,” says Dan, a 48-year-old marketing executive in the Phoenix area whose affair with a client was a factor in his divorce. “Your standards and morals tend to change a bit.”

Salespeople, he says, call it the 1,000-mile rule. “Within 1,000 miles of home, you play by the rules and don’t fool around,” he says. “Beyond 1,000 miles, you can do whatever you want.”

Most affairs involve people who aren’t meeting for the first time, says Frank Pittman, an Atlanta-based psychiatrist and author of a book, Private Lies: Infidelity and Betrayal of Intimacy.

And people in certain professions —athletes, military officers, pilots, lawyers, doctors and others in “high-profile” jobs — are more prone to have affairs, says Frederick DiBlasio, a University of Maryland professor of social work and a therapist. They have fame, power or wealth, and their positions tend to attract suitors, he says.

Stephanie, a frequent business traveler who had a past affair on the road, says she’s seen married people at trade shows act “like wild animals,” usually with other business people. “Trade shows are where the most infidelities take place,” she says.

Stephanie disapproves of the many married business travelers she has seen having “one- or two-night stands” on the road. She admits, though, that she and her current husband were on business trips and had an affair while married to their first spouses. Her first husband was also having affairs on road trips and at home, she says.

Still, “I don’t think my own affair was OK,” she says.

On the road, “There’s a sense of safety and a general rationalization that what the partner doesn’t know won’t hurt them,” says psychologist Peggy Vaughan, who has a website, DearPeggy.com, for people recovering from affairs. Some business people believe “it’s the norm to have affairs on the road,” because it’s “what successful, well-traveled people do,” she says.

Vaughan and her husband, James, also a psychologist, wrote a book in 1980 that discusses his past affairs while traveling on business. They have been married for 51 years.

Fewer people get caught “when they restrict their affairs only to out-of-town adventures,” she says. But there’s a tendency for those who don’t get caught “to gradually increase the risks they take, including moving into the more dangerous ground of in-town affairs.”

If they get caught cheating, or admit their ways, it can devastate their family relationships.

A California-based frequent traveler, also named Robert, confessed to his wife in November that he had had two out-of-town affairs since they wed about five years ago. They are undergoing intensive marriage counseling, and it’s been an “extremely painful process” trying to rebuild their relationship, he says. Robert says he was always drunk during his affairs and realizes they were an outgrowth of his upbringing. “I was raised in an alcoholic family, and I had no discipline or obedience,” he says.
His current wife says there was also a breakdown in their relationship at home before his infidelity on the road. “The stresses and demands on our lives were overwhelming,” she says.

Robert says two of his affairs were with employees who worked for him, and it would have been detrimental to his career if his employer knew about them.

“It was a conflict of interest, and I could have been fired,” he says.

A long way in a short time

Robert and his wife believe they can put the pieces of their marriage back together. They hired Carder to counsel them and believe they’ve come a long way in a short time. Carder has, among other things, made them look for the real reasons Robert strayed and made them rediscover why they were initially attracted to one another. “The key to saving any relationship after infidelity,” Carder says, “depends on the percentage of good history a couple has shared, identification of the contributing factors and stresses surrounding the inappropriate sexual relationship, the willingness to forgive and the restoration of respect and trust.”
“I’m beyond optimistic,” Robert’s wife says. “I know my marriage is going to make it.”

Only time will tell, but many other marriages dissolve after a spouse cheats on a business trip, says infidelity expert Anne Bercht. She wrote a bookabout her husband Brian’s affair.

Many business travelers “have aged 10 years in two years,” she says, “and lost jobs, marriages, respect of children, self-respect, friends and a great amount of wealth as a result of what began as a business trip, a drink or two and some flattery.”

Let’s offer some help for the cheaters out there. What do you do when you’re bored on a business trip? Keep it clean.

« Previous Entries