Extramarital Affair Leads To Mutilation Death Of Cuckolded Husband
August 27th, 2010 by The Babe
This is one sad tale of a cuckolded husband and a wife who had enough of his allegations of her infideltiy.
An African women from Zimbabwe woman has apparently murdered her husband pouring paraffin over him and setting him on fire… The actual fire didn’t kill him – after the fire incident, she removed his penis and testicles with a butcher knife..
The husband, Farai Mukombwa, made the mistake of confronting his wife over her alleged extramarital affair.
Technorati Tags: cuckolded, infideltiy, Zimbabwe, extramarital affair
Americans Canadians May Share Views on Cheating
June 16th, 2010 by The Babe-
One in three Canadians say they’ve had an affair, with Ontarians and Quebecers the most likely to have stepped out on a partner (36% and 34% respectively).
-
Married men are much more likely to have cheated than married women (13% vs. 8%) although when it comes to having a physical relationship with someone else who is married, the genders are nearly neck and neck.
-
More than half of Canadians believe everyone thinks about cheating at some point.
-
Over a third of Canadians figure cheating doesn’t mean a lack of love for one’s partner, while 18% of Canadians think cheating once can actually be positive for a relationship.
-
Quebeckers are especially forgiving, or at least understanding, of infidelity – 53% of respondents in La Belle Province said cheating on someone doesn’t mean you don’t love them, and 28% said a one-off affair can actually be beneficial to the relationship.
-
A startling 40% of Canadians say they know they were cheated on at some point
-
Only 13% of Canadians think being unhappily married but staying together for the kids’ sake is
justification for cheating. -
Apparently getting back at a cheating spouse is only a reasonable excuse for 18% of those surveyed.
-
Four in five of Canadians would confront their significant others if they suspected them of cheating.
-
60% of Canadians would check their credit card statements or phone bills for evidence, and nearly half of Canadians would go so far as to follow their partners to see where they were wandering to.
-
If amateur private eye activities unearthed evidence of an affair, 50% would confront their partners with the proof and talk about it (with women being more likely to take this approach than men).
-
Two out of five Canadians would ask if their partner was cheating and give him or her a chance to come clean before they waved the evidence in their face..
-
29% would end the relationship then and there
-
43% of Canadians would keep our options open and try to work it out.
-
Only 10% of Canadians would automatically forgive our partner’s transgressions.
Ultimately forgiving the spouse or partner could depend on the nature of the affair.
-
Nearly two thirds of Canadians would find our significant other having an affair with our best friend the hardest to forgive
-
28% said it would be most difficult if it was someone at work
-
One in four thought an ex would be the biggest blow.
And if their partners did “fess up”, what then?
When we seek out that old boyfriend or girlfriend on Facebook, are we innocently checking in to see how that person’s life is going? Or are we secretly hoping for a confidential hookup?
-
77% of Canadians admit that we’ve been in contact with someone we used to be in a relationship with, though it’s nearly split down the middle when it comes to the number of Canadians who initiated the contact and those of Canadians who found ourselves on the receiving end of an ex reaching out.
-
Just over half of Canadians figure Facebook and other social networking sites are the best way to
re-establish contact with a previous partner, -
only 10% of Canadians think looking up an former flame is a big no-no.
-
two out of five of Canadians would be willing to chat with an ex-lover because we might be able
to become friends again. -
Another two out of five would exchange cursory updates but not try to carry on communication.
-
Folks in British Columbia. were much more open to the idea of being friends with an ex (53%) than those in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (35%), while Quebecers were the most likely to say a firm “non!” – what’s in the past is in the past.
-
In general, they found women are more likely to think that reconnecting with a past lover is a bad idea.
-
A full third of those surveyed believe that all this talk of being friends with exes is baloney, and the only reason former flames try to open lines of communication is to re-establish a romantic relationship.
-
Nearly two-thirds of Canadians would never get back together with an ex,
-
one in five Canadians pine for the one that got away, and would do anything to re-ignite a specific previous relationship.
Technorati Tags: Canadians, Canadian, affair, cheating, infidelity, cheating spouse
Another Stupid Unfaithful Wife
June 10th, 2010 by The Babe
How stupid can you get? Suzanne Corona, a Batavia, New York wife has been charged with adultery by local police.
Police say an officer saw Corona and 29-year-old Justin Amend having sex on a park picnic table, in view of children and other adults, in broad daylight.
“He had a shirt, and his pants were down,” Officer Eric Hill said.
Corona and Amend were charged with public lewdness, but Corona is also accused of adultery, becoming the 13th person in New York state history to face the charge.
The cheating wife has her own take on the incident…..
“We were not naked on a picnic table – we were sitting there on the bench, fully clothed. His pants were on, my clothing was on,” Corona said. “Yes, it was inappropriate to behave in that manner in a public area.
“His genitals were exposed, perhaps, by the zipper, but that’s it – but no one would see that. I want to make clear to everyone nothing was out there, nothing was showing,” she said.
Joseph Corona, the husband, says he’s sad and hurt, but he forgives his wife.
“I’ve got 40-some more years to spend with my wife, [and] I’m not going to throw it away over one incident,” he said. “I wish that the charges were dropped and that we could resolve this as man and wife. It’s more of a private matter.”
Technorati Tags: New York, adultery, cheating wife
Cheating Wife Gets Public Humiliation After Extramarital Affair
June 9th, 2010 by The BabeThe home get’s plenty of street exposure for his rant as it is just down the street from the Jockey Lot, a well-known flea market in the area.
“All Welcome Except Cheaters Pull N 4 Pics” was scrawled in white on one brown cardboard sign.
The writing on the mobile home reads: “Lying Cheating No Good Wife Will Lose N Divorce.”
On one of his signs he’s requesting “an attorney with balls”.
Clark said in a video that hit YouTube that his wife had an affair with his “boss man.”
After viewing the interview, I’m starting to see exactly why she cheated on him.
Check out the video……
Cheating Wife & Scorned Husband
| View the Video |
Technorati Tags: South Carolina, cheating wife, extramarital affair, cheated
Keep It In Your Pants In Kandahar
June 8th, 2010 by The Babe
Recently the commander of Canada’s battle group in Kandahar, Brigadier General Daniel Ménard, was suddenly kicked to the curb and ordered to return to Canada. The unexpected firing, almost certain to end the career of a soldier considered to be on his way to the top of the army, came after his commanding officer received reports that the General was having a sexual relationship with a female member of his staff.
His firing as head of the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan because of his alleged affair — is the first Canadian general officer to be dismissed on the battlefield since the Second World War.
An extramarital affair might not seem a serious issue to those outside of the military. The public is more than willing to forgive transgressions by movie stars, politicians (including presidents) and pro golfers. But it isn’t the extramarital sex (Ménard is married with two children) that poses the problem. It’s that it happened between soldiers, in a war zone.
It turns out that Canadian soldiers in battle are not allowed to have intimate relations of any kind.
That includes kissing, hand-holding and passing naughty notes in the mess tent. Amazingly, the rule applies even if they are married, which Gen. Menard is, although, unfortunately, not to the subordinate he allegedly was having sex with.
The hypothetical scenario behind the military’s banning of relationships amongst soldiers in war zones is simple. One is unlikely to order someone they’re in love with to risk death. Even if the two participants in a relationship are able to set aside their feelings and perform as professionals, others in the unit who know of their relationship might come to doubt that they would be treated fairly
Imagine having to fight a battle with someone who recently dumped you. If ordered by someone who’d just rejected your affections to stay behind and die, might you not be the least bit suspicious as to their motive?
Had Ménard been a low-ranked officer or an enlisted man, caught having an affair with a fellow soldier, it’s possible they would have gotten off with a thorough dressing down from an officer, off the record, and an order to be more discrete about it. But since Ménard was the top man, even though he’d never have faced the decision, from the safety of his headquarters, to send another member of the HQ staff into a minefield, he still had to go. A general cannot be judged by a different standard than the troops he commands.
Would you rather have active-duty soldiers who are actually getting laid or just desperately wishing they were? Someone needs to do a study on proving that celibacy and sexual frustration – actually improves performance in battle or any other aspect of life.
Technorati Tags: Canada, Kandahar, Daniel Ménard, Canadian Forces, Afghanistan, Canadian, extramarital affair
Another Look At Presidential Candidates Views On Infidelity
May 17th, 2010 by The BabeBased on what we know now – John Edwards / Rielle Hunter Bill Clinton / Monica Lewinsky scandals and the purported affair between Barack Obama / Vera Baker, I thought you might find interesting to take Another Look At Presidential Candidates Views On Infidelity.
Couric asks
“Whether They Can Understand Voters Who Don’t Feel Comfortable Supporting A Candidate Who Cheated”
Here are some of their responses:
The Question by Katie Couric:
Harry Truman said, quote, “A man not honorable in his marital relations is not usually honorable in any other.” Many people say they don’t feel comfortable supporting someone who’s not remained faithful to their spouse. Why should they?
————————-
Barack Obama
Obama: Why should they not –
Couric: Support someone who isn’t faithful. In other words, people feel uncomfortable. Is that appropriate? Or, you know, how do you feel about that?
Obama: Well, I … you know, I do think that public morality … and private morality are not sum — you know, or not equivalent. You know, we — some of our greatest presidents haven’t always been terrific husbands. And some who have been wonderful husbands have been rotten presidents.
So, you know, I think that other countries have typically taken a little more casual on approach when it comes to the personal lives … of elected officials. And I think that there has to be some space for privacy. I will say this.
I do think that I’m very proud of the relationship I’ve got with Michelle, and the work and the value that I’ve put into it. And I hope it does say something about my character, the strength of my marriage. But, you know … if I was — had a wonderful marriage but didn’t have good ideas in terms of providing health care for every American or repairing the damage that’s been done to our foreign policy by George Bush, then my marriage alone shouldn’t qualify me … for being president.
Couric: Should infidelity qualify someone, or should infidel …
Obama: Disqualify.
Couric: … infidelity disqualify someone?
Obama: You know … I’m very cautious about applying strict moral rules to … or a blanket universal rule to … people. Because, you know, I mean, there are some people who might say that the fact that, you know, I indulged in drugs when I was young, disqualifies me. I mean, there are a lot of ways that you can apply that kind of morality. What I’m always hopeful of is that people are judge our public servants based on their passion, their commitment, their public integrity, how they operate with that public trust. And, you know, if we start getting too sanctimonious about some of these issues then there aren’t going to be that many people who are able or willing to serve.
————————-
Hilary Clinton
Clinton: Well, I can certainly understand why some people would feel that way, and … that is their perfect right to do so. But I think … would be a tough standard for most of American history to be able to meet, when we look at people who have made a big difference in our country.
I think there’s more to someone’s honor and integrity, and to their public service. I think sometimes we confuse the private and the public in ways that are not necessarily useful. So, of course, it’s a deeply personal matter that I take personally. But I think on the public stage, there are a number of people who have represented our country, led our country, accomplished great achievements on behalf of our country who might have some challenges in their personal life, but have made a great contribution.
————————-
John Edwards
Couric: So how important do you think it is in the grand scheme of things?
Edwards: I think the most important qualities in a president in today’s world are trustworthiness, sincerity, honesty, strength of leadership. And certainly that goes to a part of that. It’s not the whole thing. But it goes to a part of it.
Couric: So you think it’s an appropriate way to judge a candidate?
Edwards: Yeah. But I don’t think it’s controlling. I mean, I think that, as you point out, there have been American presidents that at least according to the … stories we’ve all heard, that were not faithful, that were in fact good presidents. So I don’t think it controls the issue. But I think it’s certain … something reasonable for people to consider.
————————-
John McCain
McCain: You know … that’s an area that I never get into. Because I think that people make judgments, and you can judge other people. I’m not very good at that. And so, I think it’s up to each person’s personal view of the individual, and … everybody has a different view.
I say that because you and I know that there have been some leaders in American history — latest information about Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I happen to still think that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an important president at a time in our history when we needed some courage. And so … that’s just frankly, a judgment that I leave to others.
————————-
Bill Richardson
Richardson: Well, I think this is … if you’re — if you’re not faithful to your wife, you’re not faithful to the country, to your ideals. You’re not faithful to the spirit in which Americans trust their political leaders. And they expect them to … have a sense of honor.
Nobody’s perfect. I’ve been married to Barbara for 35 years. We’ve had our differences, our difficulties, but we’ve stayed together. But I think being faithful is … an essential component of any relationship. It’s whether a voter can trust you to … be thinking about the common good as opposed to personal ambition or anything else.
Couric: Do you think infidelity is reason enough not to vote for someone?
Richardson: I don’t think so. I think that, you know, infidelity is … a serious problem in any marriage. But, you know, everybody sins. And it’s whether you’re forgiven, whether you forgive yourself, whether you have faith in God. You know, perfection … is something that politicians, they should not stand themselves for perfection. Nobody’s perfect.
————————-
Mitt Romney
Couric: Well, what do you think of people who base their judgment at least partially on a candidate’s ability to remain faithful to his or her spouse?
Romney: You know, I let people look at me any way they want to. I’m not gonna give advice to the American people in which aspects of a person’s life they look at. After all, the president of the United States is gonna be under a microscope. He will be. The first lady will be. The whole family will be. Every mistake will be open to the world. In some respects, you respect the nation.
In some respects you represent an example to the children of America. So we’re gonna get looked at in all sorts of ways. And I’m not gonna try and counsel the American people as to what to look at. I know they look at my faith, for instance. And I’m happy to have them do so. Some are critical. Some are positive. It’s just part of the package. And take me as … the whole character that I am.
Couric: Do you think that people shouldn’t vote for candidates if they are — commit adultery, for example?
Romney: I think people should be able to do what they want to do. And express their own views when they get into the … voting booth. I’m not gonna tell them how to … do that. And I know that people will, again, take their own counsel.
————————-
Fred Thompson
Couric: Do you think it’s an appropriate way to evaluate a candidate?
Thompson: Everybody’s gotta make up their own mind about that. I think that you can evaluate a candidate any way you want to. It’s a free country. There are a lot of things that go into it. When we elect a president, we’re electing the leader of the free world. We’re facing tremendous challenges ahead. I don’t think we’ve come to terms with the nature of the threats against us, really in terms … of radical Islam and the things we’ve got to do and the threats to the economy with the growing retirement population, things that, of that nature.
So, nobody’s perfect. Everybody has weaknesses and has made mistakes one time or another in life. But everybody’s gotta decide for themselves what they want to consider that go into making up. The leader is going to have to deal with these problems of the country.
————————-
Mike Huckabee
Huckabee: I can. If you violate the promise that you made to the one person on earth to whom you’re supposed to be closest to, and this vow was made in front of your families, your closest friends, and God, and you don’t keep that, then can we trust you to keep a promise that you made to people you don’t even know?
Huckabee: I don’t think it means that a person can’t be a good president. Obviously, there have been some great presidents who had personal issues. I think that’s going to be true of all leaders. Nobody’s perfect. Nobody. Me, anybody else. We all have flaws.
One of the things that I think I’ve learned most about life, particularly from my experience of having been a pastor, is that the people that you think are the best people on earth? Well, they’ve got some secrets sitting in there, about some pretty dark spots.
And the people you think are the dregs of the earth, there’s some qualities there. May not be on the surface, but they’re there. The capacity to make great decisions is not always the same as the capacity to make really good personal decisions.
But it does come to the matter of, I think, whether the general population will trust you, and that if what you’re saying is really true. They may believe that what you do is a good thing. It’s just they don’t, they may not believe that what you say is necessarily the truth.
————————-
Rudy Giuliani
Giuliani: Sure, I can. Absolutely. You know, they look the every single part of us. And the … only thing I can say to people is I’m not perfect, you know? And I’ve made mistakes in my life. And that … not just in that area. In other areas and I try to learn from it. I try to — I feel sorry about them. I try to learn from them so I don’t repeat them.
Sometimes I even repeat them and … you try again. I mean, you … so — I have a, maybe a more generous view of human beings and a more generous view of life. I mean, it comes from growing up as a Catholic. I mean, we’re all sinners. We’re all struggling. We’re all trying hard. We ask for forgiveness, and then we try to improve ourselves again. And I’ve — relate to other people that way. Relate to the world that way.
Technorati Tags: CBS News, Katie Couric, John Edwards, Rielle Hunter, Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, affair, Barack Obama, Vera Baker, Infidelity, Hilary Clinton, American presidents, John McCain, Bill Richardson, Mitt Romney, president of the United States, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani
Boy Toy Admits Bedding Larry Kings Wife
May 11th, 2010 by The Babe
Last month CBS reported that Hector Penate, 31, had an affair with Larry King’s wife, Shawn Southwick.
In an effort to boost his “career”, Penate admitted to screwing King’s wife right before her divorce filing last week and says she mused about Larry’s demise. He claims Shawn, 50, often spoke to him of her desire to divorce Larry, 76, and wistfully told him,
“Don’t worry, he’s gonna die soon.”
Penate claims the affair with King’s wife began in 2007.
“We had sex in Larry’s bed a lot,” he said. “I felt like it was my house.”
Southwick has denied having an affair with Penate, but he says they so had one, and not only that, it was motivated by King’s affair with Shawn’s sister, Shannon Engemann.
I wonder if Jerry Springer has any openings on his show?
Technorati Tags: Celebrity Cheaters, CBS, Hector Penate, Larry King, Shawn Southwick, Jerry Springer
Was Peace Prize Winner Getting A Piece On The Side
May 7th, 2010 by The Babe
Is it possible our 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner was getting a piece on the side? President Barack Obama has been accused of cheating on his wife Michelle with a campaign worker. The American supermarket tabloid, the National Enquirer, claims that Barack Obama and Vera Baker had a fling at Washington, D.C. hotel and a security video had all the records!
While running for US Senate, rumor has it that Obama secretly met Vera Baker at a hotel in Washington D.C.
One of the Enquirer’s “confidential investigations” apparently has learned that Obama first became close to 35 year-old Vera Baker in 2004 when she worked tirelessly to get him elected to the US Senate, raising millions in campaign contributions.
It appears that a hired limo driver confirmed the story to be true. He claims he picked Vera Baker up from a friend’s house and then carried her to The Hotel George. The driver then apparently waited in the lobby while Vera went to a room, which he says was Obama’s room. To the best of limo driver’s knowledge, Vera did not have her own room at the hotel.
It’s also being rumored that Baker was suddenly taken off the campaign midway through. Speculation is that Michelle Obama didn’t approve of Vera and was uncomfortable with her and Barack working so close together. Is this another Monica Lewinsky/Bill Clinton scandal? Or is the media desperate to start trouble wherever they can???
Is there anything beyond them staying in the same building? I admit, I thought the same of reports that John Edwards cheated on his wife with, knocked up and tried to pay off Rielle Hunter were entirely fictional. How wrong I was.
Initially, the scandal first broke in October, 2008. Ms Baker then proceeded to leave the political scene and move to Martinique, where she married. She returned to Washington after Obama’s election and began working for Illinois Senator Roland Burris. But once the scandal broke again, she left the senators office.
Although Vera Baker has denied the allegations, the Enquirer has offered a whopping sum of $1 million for confirmation.
The cyberspace storm of innuendo and unfounded rumors isn’t likely to die down anytime soon and it appears that many don’t believe the Enquirer story. Is that because it’s probably not true or simply because they choose to believe that one of their idols is not capable of blighting his marriage and career with infidelities?
It’s sadly true that though the National Enquirer is very often wrong in their attention grabbing headlines, very often there’s some foundation to their stories.
Michelle Obama isn’t a wife I’d like to cross pass with over an extramarital affair. I’d say she’s very likely to “whip his black ass”. For your sake, Mr. President, I’m hoping the gossip is untrue!
Technorati Tags: Nobel Peace Prize, National Enquirer, Barack Obama, Vera Baker, Michelle Obama, Monica Lewinsky/Bill Clinton, Rielle Hunter, rumors, extramarital affair, gossip
David Boreanaz From Bones Has Skeletons Of His Own
May 6th, 2010 by The Babe
Handsome David Boreanaz from the TV series, Bones, appears to have a few skeletons in his own closet. A few days ago he admitted to marital infidelities after claims that the woman wanted money to keep quiet.
In 2005, Boreanaz began starring opposite Emily Deschanel on the popular current prime time television series, Bones. Boreanaz has been married to actress and Playmate Jaime Bergman since November 24, 2001
The “other woman” appears to have lawyered up and hired legal bitch Gloria Allred after getting a call from Boreanaz’s attorney. Allred is quoted as saying to RadarOnline.com:
‘Now that Mr. Boreanaz is attacking her, she has decided to tell the story of their relationship, so that the truth will come out.’
Allred said the woman will be telling her story and added:
‘She is not going to be intimidated.’
Technorati Tags: David Boreanaz, TV series, Bones, Playmate, Gloria Allred
Extramarital Affair with Country Star LeeAnn Rimes
May 3rd, 2010 by The BabeThe song included the lyrics:
“What have I done?/I broke the heart of the sweetest man/What have I done?/I broke the heart of the only man who’s ever loved me.”
It makes you wonder if the the song was written during the height of Rimes cheating scandal that broke out in 2009. Rimes split from husband Dean Sheremet, her husband of seven years, in late 2009 after an onset romance with actor Eddie Cibrian turned into a real-life one.
Rimes met Cibrian on the set of “Northern Lights,” a lifetime movie, and their extramarital affair began soon after.
Sheremet filed papers in December 2009 to divorce Rimes, In the petition for divorce, Sheremet asked for Rimes to pay spousal support plus all attorney fees and costs. His lawyer Stacy D. Phillips also requested the court not to grant spousal support to Rimes.
Technorati Tags: Country music, Lee Ann Rimes, cheating, extramarital affair